Closed Door Meeting Results in Disastrous Wild Horse Plan, Largest U.S. Wild Horse Advocacy Group Says

Washington, D.C., August 2, 2018– The nation’s largest wild horseadvocacyorganization today condemned the outcome of a closed-door meeting in Salt Lake City hosted by U.S. Rep. Chris Stewart. The meeting resulted in a plan to remove 90,000 wild horses from Westernpublic landsand sterilize entire herds, which has been met with significant opposition.

The private meeting included representatives from a few animal welfare organizations and other interests hostile to wild horses. Representatives for the more than 100 wild horseadvocacyand horse welfare organizations that endorsed astatement of principlesopposing mass sterilization and removals were excluded from the meeting.

“Rep. Stewart’s agenda of mass roundups and forced sterilization of America’s wild horse herds is unscientific, unrealistically expensive, counter to the will of the American people, and would result in extinction for these iconic animals,” said Suzanne Roy, Executive Director of the American Wild Horse Conservation (formerly American Wild Horse Campaign). “Stewart’s plan would overturn nearly 50 years of protection for mustangs and burros under a law passed unanimously by Congress that recognizes the rightful place of these iconic animals on our Westernpublic lands.”

“The ‘consensus’ from the roundtable does not speak for the 80 percent of Americans that want wild horses protected on ourpublic lands,” said Brieanah Schwartz, Government Relations and Policy Counsel for the American Wild Horse Conservation. Of note is polling that shows 72 percent of Stewart’s own constituents support using humane birth control to manage wild herds, while nearly two-thirds oppose lethal management methods.

Referring to Stewart’s statement that he wants to remove wild horses “so they don’t compete withlivestockand wildlife for food and water,” Schwartz continued: “Only 29 percent of Americans thinkpublic landsshould be made available for livestock grazing, demonstrating that Americans clearly want the BLM to follow its statutory mandate to protect wild horses. In fact, livestock grazing is not required to fulfill the agency’s ‘multiple use’ mandate, and it is far more cost-effective to curtail taxpayer–subsidized spending on commercial livestock grazing than it is to permanently remove wild horses from the range.”

Meanwhile yesterday, as Rep. Stewart pushed his destructive wild horse agenda, the U.S.Senatepassed a minibus spending billthat maintained protections for wild horses and did not authorize mass sterilization. The House bill, by contrast, contains the “Stewart Amendment” that authorizesBLMto manage wild horses in non-reproducing or single-sex herds, to begin a mass sterilization, and to lay the foundation for killing horses over the age of 10 – barely middle age for wild horses.

“We commend the U.S.Senatefor supporting science and the American people by maintaining long-standing protections for wild horses and burros and rejecting a risky and inhumane mass sterilization program,” Roy continued. “We will continue to work on Capitol Hill to ensure that theSenateversion prevails as negotiations on a final spending bill continue.”

TheAmerican Wild Horse Conservation(AWHC) is dedicated to preserving American wild horses and burros in viable, free-roaming herds for generations to come, as part of our national heritage. Its grassroots mission is endorsed by a coalition of more than 60 horseadvocacy, humane, and public interest organizations.

Key Facts

• In its 2013reporton the Wild Horse and Burro Program, the National Academy of Sciences concluded that the BLM’s “Appropriate” Management Levels (AMLs) are “not based on science” and “not transparent to stakeholders.” The national AML of 17,000 – 27,000 horses and burros is the number that existed in 1971 when Congress protected them because they were “fast disappearing.”
• The agency’s AMLs are so absurdly low that in New Mexico, the AML on 14.5 million acres of BLM public land is 83 horses, or the equivalent of approximately three horses on all the land in the entire state of Rhode Island. In Stewart’s home state of Utah, the BLM’s AML also calls for the equivalent of three horses on a land mass roughly the size of all of Salt Lake City.
• The 2013 National Academy of Sciences report recommended that the BLM use fertility control as an alternative to the BLM’s current roundup/removal approach, but since that time the BLM has reduced its use of fertility control.
• The BLM currently spends 63 percent of its $80 million a year to round up, remove, and stockpile wild horses butzero percentof its budget on fertility control.
• The push to slaughter wild horsesis coming froma narrow – but powerful – special interest lobby in D.C. made up ofmillionaire and billionaire cattle rancherson America’s federal lands. Public lands ranchers make up just 2 percent of U.S. cattle operators, represent just 0.06 percent of total employment in 11 western states and, according to some estimates, produce less than 2 percent of American beef. Public lands ranchingproducesjust $1 out of every $2,500 in income and one out of every 2,000 jobs.
• Over 80 percent of BLM land grazed by livestock nationally has no wild horses present on it. In Utah, livestock graze 22 million acres of BLM land, while wild horses are restricted to 2.5 million acres of BLM land.
• It is far more cost-effective to reduce livestock grazing on the small amount of public land grazed by livestock and manage horses humanely with birth control, than it is to fund Rep. Stewart's mass wild horse removal and sterilization plan.

###