Preliminary Injunction Filed to Stop Inhumane Wild Mare Experiments

Horse Advocates Seek Injunction to BlockBLMfrom Surgically Removing Ovaries of Wild Mares

Portland, OR (Oct. 1, 2018)—A coalition of animal protection and wild horseadvocacygroups filed amotionFriday for a preliminary injunction in U.S. District Court in Oregon to stop the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from performing risky and inhumane sterilization surgeries on wild mares in Oregon. The procedure involves blindly locating and severing the ovaries while the animals remain conscious.

The preliminary injunction motion was filed by the public interest law firm Meyer, Glitzenstein and Eubanks LLP on behalf of the American Wild Horse Conservation (formerly American Wild Horse Campaign); The Cloud Foundation (TCF) and its executive director Ginger Kathrens, who is also the Humane Advocate on theBLM’s National Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board; theAnimal WelfareInstitute (AWI); and wildlife photographer Carol Walker, who is also a director of field documentation for the Wild Horse Freedom Federation.

At issue is theBLM’s decision to proceed with surgical sterilization experiments on 100 wild mares from the Warm Springs Herd Management Area in Oregon, despite significant public outcry, veterinary opposition, and the withdrawal of Colorado State University which was previously slated to partner with theBLMand oversee the experiments. After CSU withdrew in August, theBLMannounced two weeks later that it would nevertheless proceed with the plan and simply dropped the objective of determining whether the experiments were humane.

TheBLMnow intends to begin performing the highly invasive and risky surgery—known as “ovariectomy via colpotomy”—on the mares at the agency’s Hines, OR, facility beginning on November 5.

“Ovariectomy via colpotomy” is widely regarded to be an outdated and inhumane surgical procedure. The National Academy of Sciences explicitly called this procedure “inadvisable” due to health risks in its comprehensive report on wild horse management. Under this method of sterilization, a veterinarian inserts his arm into a mare’s abdominal cavity through an incision in the vaginal wall, manually locates the ovaries, then twists, severs, and removes them using a rod-like tool with a chain on the end. TheBLM’s experiment involves performing ovariectomies on pregnant mares—which carries significant risks to both the horses and the unborn foals—in an effort to quantify the incidence of abortions that would result.

“Because theBLMis choosing to experiment on America’s wild horse mares by ripping out their ovaries with a chain, killing any unborn foals, public observation is absolutely essential,” Kathrens of The Cloud Foundation said. “It is appalling to consider the use of this medieval, gruesome procedure in the unsterile environment of the Hines Corrals, let alone out on the range.”

AWHC and the other plaintiffs initially filed theircomplainton Sept. 21 againstBLM, citing violations of the U.S. Constitution and three federal laws.

As part of the lawsuit, equine veterinarians submitted sworn declarations detailing numerousanimal welfareconcerns with theBLM’s plan. One veterinarian with extensive experience operating on wild horses emphasized that this procedure “is extremely risky due to its blind nature” and that it is “inherently difficult for a surgeon to avoid severing other organs, including the bowel, and causing severe infection and internal bleeding during this blind approach.”

Further complicating matters is theBLM’s refusal to allow meaningful observation by independent observers. The lawsuit argues that this refusal violates the plaintiffs’ rights under the First Amendment to observe and document these experiments—a critical component of the public’s ability to understand how theBLMis attempting to manage federally protected wild horses.

“TheBLMmust abandon its plan to perform this barbaric surgical experiment on federally protected wild horses,” said Brieanah Schwartz, government relations and policy counsel for the AWHC. “The inhumane nature of this procedure has been documented on video, demonstrating why theBLMis dead set against providing meaningful public observation of the experiments. Once the public sees what our government is doing to our cherished wild horses, the American people won’t stand for it.”

“TheBLM’s aggressive pursuit of dangerous sterilization surgeries flies in the face of the statutory mandate the agency must abide by to protect America’s wild horses,” said Joanna Grossman, Ph.D., AWI’s equine program manager. “That theBLMis blocking these ovariectomy experiments from public view is not at all surprising. The public would be aghast to learn the full details of these highly invasive surgeries that endanger the welfare and lives of these animals.”

Additional:

Understanding Our Lawsuit: Oregon Mare Experiments