Ranchers Blame Wild Horses Unfairly, Says BLM Scientist
Wild Horse Management
Read time: Three Minutes
Published: June 19, 2014

Written by:
AWHC Contributor
Recent data from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has sparked a debate over the true impact of wild horses on public lands. Despite ranchers' claims, the data shows thatlivestocksignificantly outnumber wild horses in Utah, challenging the narrative that wild horses are the primary cause of overgrazing.
TheEquine Welfare Alliance (EWA), in collaboration withThe Cloud FoundationandWild Horse Freedom Federation, releasedBLMlivestockdata for Beaver County and Iron County, Utah. This data reveals thatlivestockoutnumber wild horses by a ratio of 10.6:1 in these areas.
“It is irresponsible and false for Iron County commissioners or anyone to claim that the wild horses in that area are having a significant negative impact onlivestockand wildlife as some local news releases have indicated,”stated Bob Edwards, a Range Scientist and 30-year veteran of the BLM.“Having been well acquainted with these areas for over 25 years as a BLM employee, it is obvious that resource degradation has been and presently is mostly caused bylivestockwhich have been historically allowed on these areas in excess numbers and duration.”
“The situation of lacking forage started years ago with continual overuse of forage resources bylivestock. The practice still occurs. To now use the wild horses as a scapegoat becauselivestocknumbers must be reduced is totally unfair and unacceptable,”Edwards continued.“The rationale for this is not and cannot be based on scientific data. The BLM and Iron County commissioners must step up and deal with the real problem on the landscape: allowinglivestockto graze public lands.”
Angry ranchers began demanding the removal of the wild horses shortly after theBLMrequested them to reduce their ownlivestockgrazing due to ongoing drought conditions.“Faced with the loss of cheap forage for their cattle and sheep, the ranchers found a way to deflect the blame and economic burden,”says Vickery Eckhoff, an Alternet writer who was fired by Forbes after writing an article critical of welfare ranching.
“When theBLMrefers to wild horses as ‘overpopulated’ they must have their tongues firmly in their cheeks,” says Ginger Kathrens, Director of The Cloud Foundation. “The only reason they characterize wild horses as overpopulated is because they allocate the lions’ share of forage tolivestock.”
“TheBLMis correct on one point,” states R.T. Fitch, President of Wild Horse Freedom Federation. “Public landsare overgrazed; but the villains are not wild horses, burros, and wildlife. The destruction comes from privately owned,BLM-approved, taxpayer-subsidized, welfare cattle and sheep.”
Links:
- 2013 Livestock vs. Wild Horses Data from the BLM
- Ranchers Want Our Public Lands for Their Livestock, and Want the Government to Stick It to Wild Horses and Taxpayers.
Subscribe to our newsletter:
