Wild Horse Advocates Seek to Join Wyoming Lawsuit Against BLM

Wild horse advocacy groups across the country are pushing to intervene in a federal lawsuit filed by the state of Wyoming against the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The lawsuit accuses the federal agency of not doing enough to reduce wild horse populations. Two coalitions of horse advocate groups have filed papers in federal court in Wyoming seeking to enter the state's lawsuit. One group includes the American Wild Horse Conservation (formerly American Wild Horse Campaign), headquartered in North Carolina, and the other includes Friends of Animals, headquartered in Connecticut.

Wyoming Governor Matt Mead claims in the state's lawsuit that theBLMisn't doing enough to control horse numbers, asserting that too many wild horses can harm habitats used by wildlife. "It is my belief, and the belief of other western governors, that theBLMdoes not have the resources to manage wild horses effectively," Mead said after filing the lawsuit. "By filing suit, it sends a message that wild horse management is a priority and theBLMmust be provided the funding necessary to manage them."

By pushing to intervene in the case, the horse advocate groups are widening their attack on horse-management practices in Wyoming. The American Wild Horse Conservation (formerly American Wild Horse Preservation) and other groups are pursuing a separate federal lawsuit, claiming that theBLMviolated federal law by rounding up over 1,200 horses from three areas in Wyoming this summer. The groups filed their main brief in their federal lawsuit against theBLMlast week.

The agency announced in October that it had rounded up 1,263 wild horses in the Great Divide Basin, Adobe Town, and Salt Wells Creekherd management areas. These areas are within the Checkerboard Region of southwestern Wyoming, where private and federal lands are laid out in alternating sections. The Rock Springs Grazing Association has pressed for years to reduce grazing on private lands by wild horses and has intervened in the groups' lawsuit challenging this summer's roundup.

TheBLMhad estimated there were 3,771 wild horses in Wyoming before the contested roundup. In its lawsuit, Wyoming claims the horse population after the roundup still exceeded appropriate levels in sevenherd management areasby about 475 total horses.

Suzanne Roy, director of the American Wild Horse Conservation, said that the future of Wyoming's wild horses is at stake in both cases. "It's a larger issue of how ourpublic landsare managed, and for whom they are managed," Roy said. "The state is now taking on the Wyoming ranchers' fight against wild horses, and we feel strongly we need to stand up for Wyoming'smustangs. And we're prepared to vigorously defend them in court."

Anne Novak, executive director of ProtectMustangs, issued a statement saying her group feels compelled to intervene in Wyoming's lawsuit because it believes theBLMisn't protecting America's wild horses and burros as it should. "BLM's new wipe-out plan is to complain their hands are tied and then invite states and other land-grabbers to sue them to round up wild horses - under false claims of overpopulation," Novak said. "This subterfuge must be stopped."

Jenni Barnes, staff attorney for Friends of Animals Wildlife Law Program, stated that her group is appalled Wyoming is pushing to remove even more wild horses from ourpublic lands. "We all have a right to be involved in decisions about ourpublic lands," Barnes said. "Yet it appears that Wyoming is trying to bypass this process and make a side deal withBLMto eradicate wild horses."

Originally Posted By Associated Press